Received: from wallace.ece.rice.edu (root@wallace.ece.rice.edu [128.42.12.154]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12408 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 16:56:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu) Received: by wallace.ece.rice.edu via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:56:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:56:51 -0600 From: "Ross J. Reedstrom" To: Hannu Krosing Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Message-ID: <20000207155651.B25285@rice.edu> References: <20000207151123.A25083@rice.edu> <389F3CAE.9E4C249A@tm.ee> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i In-Reply-To: <389F3CAE.9E4C249A@tm.ee>; from hannu@tm.ee on Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 11:44:14PM +0200 On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 11:44:14PM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote: > "Ross J. Reedstrom" wrote: > > > > > > Anyone else interested, I'm using the tarball from: > > > > ftp://epoch.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/mariposa/src/alpha-1/mariposa-alpha-1.tar.gz > > > > Is mariposa licence compatible with ours ? It better be, it's the same license ;-) That is, Mariposa is a branch off the Postgres95 tree. Actually, it's a good question: the PG95 license would have let them put just about any license on Mariposa they wanted. After running both COPYRIGHT files throught fmt, here's the diff output: wallace$ diff COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.pgsql 1c1,2 < Mariposa Distributed Data Base Management System --- > PostgreSQL Data Base Management System (formerly known as Postgres, > then as Postgres95). 3c4 < Copyright (c) 1994-6 Regents of the University of California --- > Copyright (c) 1994-7 Regents of the University of California 21d21 < wallace$ So, it is word for word the PostgreSQL license. Ross -- Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer Computer and Information Technology Institute Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005