Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAB7475FEE for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:31:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.libertyrms.com (unknown [209.167.124.227]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5375475EF7 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:31:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from andrew by mail.libertyrms.com with local (Exim 3.22 #3 (Debian)) id 17w1aE-0000vZ-00 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:31:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:31:38 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Cause of missing pg_clog files Message-ID: <20020930103138.C1405@mail.libertyrms.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org References: <8183.1033166430@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200209280030.g8S0UcR16258@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200209280030.g8S0UcR16258@candle.pha.pa.us>; from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:30:38PM -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/1773 X-Sequence-Number: 29730 On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, we need a decision on whether we are going to do a 7.2,3 or just > have it in beta3. If it is in 7.2.3, I would not mention it in the > beta3 release notes. If there won't be any 7.2.3, could a note be put up on the website at least? This is a pretty serious problem, and new users right now will be using 7.2.2, which has this bug. They should be warned. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110