Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925EB475A1E for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 18:54:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from lubitsch.akademie.de (ns.akademie.de [62.165.4.3]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9174758C9 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 18:54:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from pd95170ad.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.81.112.173] helo=ianb.local) by lubitsch.akademie.de with asmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 18NM6i-0006lJ-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:54:08 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ian Barwick To: Bruce Momjian Subject: Re: Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:53:57 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: Tom Lane , dbi-dev@perl.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, david@wheeler.net References: <200212142337.gBENb1n00799@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200212142337.gBENb1n00799@candle.pha.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200212150053.57905.barwick@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200212/44 X-Sequence-Number: 3457 On Sunday 15 December 2002 00:37, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Thanks. Patch applied. David, time to package up a new version of DBD:P= g? Sorry Bruce, I've missed a couple of days through illness and am just catching up. I think I was gong to submit a slightly different version of the patch plus a couple of notes for the README file. Can you hold off 24 hours or so? Ian Barwick barwick@gmx.net