X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9333475458 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:51:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web21406.mail.yahoo.com (web21406.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.232.76]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B98BE474E44 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:51:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20030415235118.12167.qmail@web21406.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.81.205.234] by web21406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:51:18 PDT Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:51:18 -0700 (PDT) From: ow Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum? To: Tom Lane , bruc@acm.org Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <10857.1050448704@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-25.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/546 X-Sequence-Number: 38036 --- Tom Lane wrote: > Please keep in mind that I was replying to a poster who said > "cross-db > queries on the same server (meaning same postmaster, for our > purposes) > are trivial; why hasn't Postgres got them when everybody else does?" I think you're referring to one of my messages. If this is the case, then you've misquoted me, that was not what I said. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com