X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD9530DD44 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:42:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56488-10 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:41:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mobile.hub.org (u153n214.eastlink.ca [24.224.153.214]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15BD30DD46 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:41:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: by mobile.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A69BF4F0B; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:41:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19AC4ED7; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:41:43 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:41:43 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker X-X-Sender: scrappy@hub.org To: Tom Lane Cc: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Feature freeze date In-Reply-To: <6366.1055287212@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-ID: <20030610214130.X720@hub.org> References: <200306101925.h5AJPd418238@candle.pha.pa.us> <6366.1055287212@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200306/232 X-Sequence-Number: 39539 On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > We are 5 days away from the feature freeze date, but with the almost > > week of downtime we have had, I don't think we can stick to that date. > > Do we choose July 1 as feature freeze and July 15 as beta, or push beta > > start to Auguest 1? > > I don't think a week of partial downtime justifies a month's slip. > > The July 1/15 schedule seems like it might be a good plan though. > I know I'm not going to be done editing error messages by June 15 ... July 1/15 sounds good to me as well ...