X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05209D1B8A9; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 05:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09108-03; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 02:48:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perrin.int.nxad.com (internal.ext.nxad.com [69.1.70.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02267D1B89A; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 02:48:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: by perrin.int.nxad.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2BC3C2105E; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 22:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 22:48:16 -0700 From: Sean Chittenden To: Jan Wieck , The Hermit Hacker Cc: Bruce Momjian , Tom Lane , Curt Sampson , Brent Verner , pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Message-ID: <20030817054815.GA70920@perrin.int.nxad.com> References: <200308162322.h7GNMlu11139@candle.pha.pa.us> <20030816234336.R570@hub.org> <200308162322.h7GNMlu11139@candle.pha.pa.us> <3F3EEB63.6070306@Yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030816234336.R570@hub.org> <3F3EEB63.6070306@Yahoo.com> X-PGP-Key: finger seanc@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3849 3760 1AFE 7B17 11A0 83A6 DD99 E31F BC84 B341 X-Web-Homepage: http://sean.chittenden.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200308/128 X-Sequence-Number: 7968 > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >I assume we agreed against adding a MySQL mode --- just verifying. > > We agreed that applications that need schema information are much better > off using the schema views. > > Jan Heh, I don't think there was any agreement on anything in that thread, everyone had their own view (no pun intended). > From: The Hermit Hacker > > Personally, I think adding the SHOW commands would be a good thing > ... psql is nice with its \df to get information without having to > learn all the JOINs required ... having that ability easily from any > of the interfaces would definitely be a plus ... to me, its not > about MySQL compatibility, but about a small improvement to ease of > use :) Which goes back to the point about there being little agreement on this patch or its issues. A handful of folks think it's a _user interface_ issue (read: psql, phppgadmin, pgadminIII, etc) and would be good for converting MySQL users to PostgreSQL (or simply because its easy and less obtuse than a \ command), others thought it was a fugly hack to have a parser in the front end and that it should be handled on the backend by extending SQL to conform to MySQL's interface (that some argue is incorrect and would unjustly bloat the backend) that way all clients have the SHOW syntax (thus averting a possible FAQ), and others took a more elitist mindset and simply thought that everyone should just select from the information schemas. *shrug* I tabled working on the patch until there was some kind of agreement from someone with commit privs and am waiting to pick up quashing the remaining parser state bug until after 7.4's out the door or there's renewed interest from non-users. -sc -- Sean Chittenden