X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94081D1B495 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:11:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17146-10 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:11:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BB83D1B389 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:11:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 10462 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Jul 2004 22:11:10 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-233-214.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) (82.82.233.214) by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 02 Jul 2004 00:11:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: Jochem van Dieten , Bruno Wolff III Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:11:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List References: <40E37E3F.2050400@telstra.net> <20040701172310.GA2908@wolff.to> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407020011.09809.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/64 X-Sequence-Number: 55625 Jochem van Dieten wrote: > PS I think I spotted an inconsistency in the standard. It says "to > tables that are defined in this Clause", while the Clause only > defines views, not tables. Tables are "base tables", views are "derived tables", so this is OK.