X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93937DB797 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:20:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35582-10-2 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:20:37 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: delayed 00:55:02.633001 by SQLgrey- Received: from svr2.postgresql.org (svr2.postgresql.org [65.19.161.25]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C20DB553 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:20:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from kuu.deru.net (kuu.deru.net [140.99.31.34]) by svr2.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E09BF0CA9 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:25:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [67.136.151.167] (helo=phx-dialpool-67-136-151-167.ispnetbilling.com) by kuu.deru.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.43) id 1EcAB3-0003zM-Ao for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:25:26 -0700 From: Trent Shipley Reply-To: tshipley@deru.com To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our website! Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:27:01 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <227C7FFACEA9D9118BD600096BA5A7CA011E188B@EIBPOST> <43795A96.9070500@proximity.com.au> In-Reply-To: <43795A96.9070500@proximity.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511151627.02275.tshipley@deru.com> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - kuu.deru.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - postgresql.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - deru.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[MANY_EXCLAMATIONS=0] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/769 X-Sequence-Number: 76051 On Monday 2005-11-14 20:48, Tim Allen wrote: OOPS deleted pg_xlog because surely it was only a log file. > > We've seen reports of people firing this particular foot-gun before, > haven't we? Would it make sense to rename pg_xlog to something that > doesn't sound like it's "just" full of log files? Eg pg_wal - something > where the half-educated will have no idea what it is, and therefore not > think they know what they can do with it. > > Tim Renaming the file sounds like an excellent design decision since the current name is a proven "human factor" bug.