X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1183A11F6C2A for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:17:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51064-03 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:17:07 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41C7B11F6C15 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:17:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Apr 2006 18:17:03 -0000 Received: from dslb-084-063-020-165.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [84.63.20.165] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 03 Apr 2006 20:17:03 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Feature list for SQL:2003 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:17:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604032017.01997.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.133 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133] X-Spam-Score: 0.133 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200604/86 X-Sequence-Number: 81809 I wanted to look through the SQL:2003 standard to update our conformance feature list, but I noticed that the list of enumerated features is exactly the same as in SQL:1999. So either I have an old draft that does not have an updated feature taxonomy, or all the new features in 2003 are mandatory and we're out of luck. Can someone check that? The features are listed in Annex F of the respective parts. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/