X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCF011F6B4F for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:17:19 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: -2.425 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.425 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.174, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id izf+V2Z1SiXS for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:17:11 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F111D11F6AAF for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:17:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: by noel.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5BBAB56423; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:17:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1001); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:17:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:17:07 -0500 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Message-ID: <20060420171707.GD49405@pervasive.com> References: <200604201102.k3KB21H07902@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200604201102.k3KB21H07902@candle.pha.pa.us> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 amd64 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Hashcash: 1:20:060420:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us::Yqtaj00AwIf+GZ08:000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000QlN X-Hashcash: 1:20:060420:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org::KKXSHh3Ge/1v81Bk:000000000 0000000000000000000000005rPg X-Archive-Number: 200604/739 X-Sequence-Number: 82462 Here's one to add to the list: running pgbench with a moderately heavy load on an SMP box likes to trigger a state where the database (or pgbench) just stops doing work (CPU usage drops to nothing, as does disk activity). I've been able to repro this on 2 Intel boxes (one a 2 way, one a 4 way), and a dual Opteron, all running the latest windows binary. A 50 connection test running 1000 transactions is pretty much ensured to fail. I've been unable to produce the same behavior on a single-proc machine. Please let me know if there's any more info that would be helpful. On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 07:02:01AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Folks, my mailbox is filling with unresolved Win32 bug reports, > specifically: > > integer division > shared memory > statistics collector > rename > fsync > > I have put the emails at the bottom of the patches_hold queue: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold > > -- > Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461