X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01489FB223
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:35:31 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 58763-02 for
	<pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:35:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from svana.org (svana.org [125.62.87.134])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932CD9FA5FB
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:35:22 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from kleptog by svana.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1GCbf6-00044G-GY; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:35:20 +1000
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:35:20 +0200
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Message-ID: <20060814123520.GC11315@svana.org>
Reply-To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
References: <36e682920604151205i75a08030x7c05a6f52fccf095@mail.gmail.com>
	<AB8B2106-EA96-4577-845B-6604CC140AEC@pgedit.com>
	<36e682920604190909p68649a35m1953a7b4262b8852@mail.gmail.com>
	<200604200851.25569.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<20060420140501.GB1984@svana.org> <18559.1145545471@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20060420154805.GD1984@svana.org> <19168.1145548592@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20060814074150.GA11315@svana.org> <22543.1155557376@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <22543.1155557376@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-PGP-Key-ID: Length=1024; ID=0x0DC67BE6
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 295F A899 A81A 156D B522  48A7 6394 F08A 0DC6 7BE6
X-PGP-Key-URL: <http://svana.org/kleptog/0DC67BE6.pgp.asc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kleptog@svana.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on svana.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200608/886
X-Sequence-Number: 88379


--qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:09:36AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Any thoughts on this? Make it a TODO item, document it, or simply
> > ignore it?
>=20
> It's like a two-line patch, so hardly worth putting in TODO ... might
> as well just do it.  IIRC the motivation is mostly to silence a
> Coverity warning?

Well sort of. I can also just tick a box and the warning goes away too.
It just seemed from the discussion that it was something people were
going to fix...

Have a nice day,
--=20
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to l=
itigate.

--qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE4G4IIB7bNG8LQkwRAiEGAJ48wbIJS2NTcadrTaD9CpRi9kde2QCfQaAX
fhf6d8vMHfRqKXwHCwdIdl0=
=z6/Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz--