Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706189F9AE3 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 17:59:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31539-01 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 17:59:49 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41359F9AD6 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 17:59:49 -0300 (ADT) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [63.195.55.98] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO [192.168.2.3]) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 13160944; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:04:09 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL @ Sun To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: WIP patch for latestCompletedXid method of computing snapshot xmax Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 14:00:55 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Tom Lane References: <3018.1189214811@sss.pgh.pa.us> <28198.1189282917@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <28198.1189282917@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709081400.56045.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/362 X-Sequence-Number: 107514 Tom, > So on the strength of that, I'm going to go ahead and commit the patch, > but I'd be interested to see benchmarks from people with access to > better hardware. Is the latest version of the patch from -patches the one I should test? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco