Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754FD633D5B for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21456-07 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C453632939 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535D153BC92 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68647-03; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 9639553BC8A; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B3B53BC89; Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:52 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:54:52 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Aidan Van Dyk cc: Tom Lane , Andrew Dunstan , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up In-Reply-To: <20090526153501.GG15213@yugib.highrise.ca> Message-ID: <20090526185313.T35116@hub.org> References: <4A189843.3010200@agliodbs.com> <20090524165012.GL8123@tamriel.snowman.net> <4A1A52F5.7030009@hagander.net> <20090525122821.GO8123@tamriel.snowman.net> <4A1BABBC.7070803@hagander.net> <4A1BE039.70008@dunslane.net> <10273.1243343651@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4A1BFF70.4000506@dunslane.net> <20090526144812.GC15213@yugib.highrise.ca> <12570.1243351182@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20090526153501.GG15213@yugib.highrise.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200905/1055 X-Sequence-Number: 138597 On Tue, 26 May 2009, Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > * Tom Lane [090526 11:20]: >> Aidan Van Dyk writes: >>> This has been raised and ignored many times before on -hackers... The >>> reason is because the tags in the CVS repository are "broken" (i.e they >>> are such that it's impossible to actually create all the tags), so the >>> git "cvsimport" tools that try to tags all croak on the PG CVS repository. >> >>> The tool which doesn't croak doesn't try and import all the tags, just >>> the sticky "branch tags"... >> >>> Scripts to "fix" (actually, remove) the broken tags have also been >>> posted, along with requests that if somebody is "mucking" with the >>> actual repository, to make sure it's known about, and access is "denied" >>> during the mucking period (access being any rsync/anoncvs/mirroring of >>> the cvs root). >> >> Up to now I've always been of the opinion that fixing those tags wasn't >> worth taking any risk for. But if we are thinking of moving away from >> CVS, then this clearly becomes one of the hurdles we have to jump on the >> way. Can you refresh our memory about which tags are problematic and >> exactly what needs to be done about 'em? > > Specifically, it's 2 tags, and I just remove them: > REL7_1_BETA2 > REL7_1_BETA3 So, you are suggesting: cvs -q tag -d REL7_1_BETA2 . cvs -q tag -d REL7_1_BETA3 . correct? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664