Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A667A63473F for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47563-09 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA1063462A for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EC353BC76 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47589-05; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 40B6253BC6B; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F67F53BC59; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:55 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 22:58:55 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Kevin Grittner cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andrew Dunstan , Aidan Van Dyk , Tom Lane Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up In-Reply-To: <4A1DA009.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov> Message-ID: <20090527225758.G35116@hub.org> References: <4A189843.3010200@agliodbs.com> <20090526153501.GG15213@yugib.highrise.ca> <20090526185313.T35116@hub.org> <200905271633.28594.peter_e@gmx.net> <306EEBC41F4E2BA856DDE879@ganymede.hub.org> <4A1DA009.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200905/1187 X-Sequence-Number: 138729 On Wed, 27 May 2009, Kevin Grittner wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > >> I'm curious as to what is different about these vs all the other >> tags I've ever done, both before, and after ... > > Any chance you tagged, changes were committed, and you then tagged > files from such a later commit as part of the release, or moved the > tag to the later commit? Those are perfectly reasonable things to do > under the CVS philosophy, and not in line with the philosophy of some > of the other products. > > If there's a chance you did that on a couple beta releases in that > time frame, and on no others, that might explain it. Actually, I have done that on at least one of the 8.x tags too, so if that is it, more then those two tags should be causing issues ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664