Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C669E633A4B
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:14:08 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 26409-03-2
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:13:54 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E2A06348DE
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:13:58 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2009 13:13:56 -0000
Received: from a91-154-107-53.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO vanquo.pezone.net)
	[91.154.107.53]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp061) with SMTP; 13 Jun 2009 15:13:56 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Db/ZAA0RDIyb58WGMKjpFsq1cxQiiJJ+OgDryUk
	26ysFHe/btq3d7
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgindent run coming
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:13:52 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.26-2-686; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; )
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
References: <200906101950.n5AJoFP01545@momjian.us>
	<200906102344.53483.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<13137.1244667281@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <13137.1244667281@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906131613.53870.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.66
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.126 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.126
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200906/903
X-Sequence-Number: 139958

On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:54:41 Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> >>> I think it usually does that already ...
> >
> > Um, attached you will find a bunch of counterexamples.
>
> At a quick look, I'm not sure that any of these are in code that hasn't
> been edited since the 8.3 pgindent run.

So what does that mean then?  Surely pgindent doesn't keep track of what has 
been edited when?