Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31667633CA4
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:48:03 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 02064-04
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:47:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.anarazel.de (mail.anarazel.de [217.115.131.40])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812F26337A3
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:47:52 -0400 (AST)
Received: from alap2.localnet (e178208094.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.208.94])
	by mail.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 027D5448005;
	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:47:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Small locking bugs in hs
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:47:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.33-rc3-andres-00151-gfd6fedc; KDE/4.3.90;
	x86_64; ; )
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
References: <200912272012.32556.andres@anarazel.de>
	<603c8f071001071016h211ff0e2x41fea95835f74fb4@mail.gmail.com>
	<1263641555.26654.49468.camel@ebony>
In-Reply-To: <1263641555.26654.49468.camel@ebony>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201001200447.47382.andres@anarazel.de>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.407 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.192,
	BAYES_00=-2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201001/1924
X-Sequence-Number: 155145

On Saturday 16 January 2010 12:32:35 Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:16 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > While unlikely to cause issues two new LWLockAcquire calls use the
> > > wrong locking mode.
> > > Patch attached.
> > 
> > Does it make sense to add this to the 2010-01 CommitFest so we don't
> > lose track of it?
> 
> No. As mentioned upthread, this is not a bug.
Could you also mention in a littlebit more detail why not?

Thanks,

Andres