From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <201008231925.o7NJPDD16301@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem --
	anyone remember this?
In-Reply-To: <1282590106-sup-7578@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun ago 23 14:55:55 -0400 2010:
> 
> > OK, I have attached a proposed patch to improve this.  I moved the
> > pg_clog mention to a new paragraph and linked it to the reason the
> > default is relatively low.
> > 
> > Comments?
> 
> I think the new para doesn't make much sense, in context.  Why does it
> say "freeze"?  How can we expect users to understand how that is
> related to this parameter?

I have removed the freeze mention per Tom's comment and posted an
updated version that removes the 'freeze' wording.  Are there other
changes needed?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +