Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jtfJF-0002hf-H6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:46:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jtfJE-00005Z-7F for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:46:28 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jtfJE-00005Q-0W for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:46:28 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jtfJA-00019Z-A1 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:46:27 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 069MkKc62011048; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:46:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack In-reply-to: <20200701032839.GA16862@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20200701032839.GA16862@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Tue, 30 Jun 2020 23:28:39 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2011046.1594334780.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:46:20 -0400 Message-ID: <2011047.1594334780@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > On 2020-Jun-30, Tom Lane wrote: >> SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0); >> +WARNING: leftover placeholder tuple detected in BRIN index "brinidx",= deleting >> So (1) the comment needs to be adjusted to mention that vacuum >> cancellation is enough to create the situation, and (2) probably the >> message needs to be downgraded quite a lot, DEBUG2 or even less. >> Or maybe we could just delete the quoted stanza altogether. > Yeah, maybe deleting the whole thing is a decent answer. When I wrote > that, I was thinking that it was a very unlikely event, but evidently > that's not true. trilobite (also a CCA animal) just reported one of these, too: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=3Dtrilobite&dt=3D2= 020-07-09%2008%3A03%3A08 Were you going to fix this, or did you expect me to? If the latter, I lean to just deleting the message. regards, tom lane