Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D32A189E83A;
	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:34:47 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from gauss.credativ.com ([93.94.130.89])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <michael@fam-meskes.de>)
	id 1SHd5d-00061S-2V; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:34:46 +0000
Received: from feivel (exit.credativ.com [87.139.82.80])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mme@gauss.credativ.com)
	by gauss.credativ.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80A121B41EE;
	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:34:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by feivel (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F0CC29F21C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:34:27 +0200
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Message-ID: <20120410153427.GA14626@feivel.credativ.lan>
Mail-Followup-To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>,
	Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
	Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
References: <4F74E6A7.8040204@cybertec.at>
	<20120407112008.GA2286@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<20120407155042.GB11987@tornado.leadboat.com>
	<20120408142501.GA21513@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<4F81BE55.1010904@cybertec.at>
	<20120408173859.GA4915@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<4F83E2B9.3030302@cybertec.at>
	<20120410143722.GC6129@tornado.leadboat.com>
	<20120410145501.GA11554@feivel.credativ.lan>
	<4F8450C7.7000707@cybertec.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F8450C7.7000707@cybertec.at>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201204/476
X-Sequence-Number: 206279

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> OK. Next question: now that both patches are intended to be applied,
> should I send a unified single patch that contains the previous functio=
nality
> and the required fixes or a new one that only contains the last require=
d fixes?

I'm fine with whatever is easier for you.=20

Michael
--=20
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! For=C3=A7a Bar=C3=A7a! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, P=
ostgreSQL