Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:22:06 -0500
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, Brar Piening <brar@gmx.de>,
	Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC
Message-ID: <20130205182206.GA6494@tornado.leadboat.com>
References: <50FF7FD0.7050705@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<50FF897B.2050603@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<20130124013825.GA29954@tornado.leadboat.com>
	<5100AA63.2050604@2ndQuadrant.com> <5100C2FD.70800@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<510359A8.3020100@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<20130126145608.GA19977@tornado.leadboat.com>
	<510BA318.2030503@2ndquadrant.com>
	<510BC942.2040307@dunslane.net> <51113492.6090108@dunslane.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51113492.6090108@dunslane.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:34:26AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> OK, I have looked at this and it seems perfectly sane. In fact, after a  
> very frustrating time VS2012 is the *only* way I have found to get a 64  
> bit build using MS tools on Windows 8. Given that, I propose to backport  
> these changes to 9.2 so we can get some buildfarm coverage of that tool  
> chain that includes the latest stable release.

Thanks for reviewing.  A backpatch seems adequately low-risk to me.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers