Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 22:37:56 -0500
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: Partial patch status update, 3/3/13
Message-ID: <20130304033756.GL16142@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <5133C207.3040509@agliodbs.com> <5134135E.8070809@2ndquadrant.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cu0tTm4JZ6pQKNna"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5134135E.8070809@2ndquadrant.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org


--cu0tTm4JZ6pQKNna
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

* Craig Ringer (craig@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> > - Awaiting discussion of syntax:
> > -- PL/PgSQL STRICT

I agree w/ Josh and Craig that this should probably be bounced- mainly
because we need to get 9.3 properly underway and this looks to continue
to be an area of much discussion.

> > -- Matview WIP Patch

This appears to be OBE. :)

> > - Awaiting discussion of difficult issues:
> > -- bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
> Small and difficult -> punt it, IMO.

I'd really love to have this properly fixed in 9.3, but I've not been
able to find time to spend on it myself, unfortunately.  I continue to
think that we should build on what we've already got in psql wrt
function handling, but others have differing opinions, apparently.

	Thanks,

		Stephen

--cu0tTm4JZ6pQKNna
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlE0FxQACgkQrzgMPqB3kigeMACgnCm4OoYo662ctAmLx01o1VJH
I7YAn3Pz5CyEV1ymMBAY4X68g5kYTnQh
=mjxv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cu0tTm4JZ6pQKNna--