Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:54:01 +0100
From: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Mitsumasa KONDO <kondo.mitsumasa@gmail.com>
Cc: KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo.mitsumasa@lab.ntt.co.jp>, fabriziomello@gmail.com,
 Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Time-Delayed Standbys
Message-ID: <20131204135401.GK24801@awork2.anarazel.de>
References: 
 <CAFcNs+oXq5ZPaKARRn3VZGzX+AnTZCaEjR6VmQT_tvoFiqgaSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <52984711.8040806@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CAFcNs+oNDqVQ7GZXGxCLiGk2o1xdy=FnhR4QAMjJ_BvfR8BmAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <529E8FE6.6040209@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <20131204092233.GA26559@awork2.anarazel.de>
 <CADupcHU+WAaadvaX3MOETZd6LBXnog15pdD8_sWU94PNiUDHmg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADupcHU+WAaadvaX3MOETZd6LBXnog15pdD8_sWU94PNiUDHmg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 2013-12-04 22:47:47 +0900, Mitsumasa KONDO wrote:
> 2013/12/4 Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
> When it happened, psql cannot connect standby server at all. I think this
> behavior is not good.
> It should only delay recovery position and can seen old delay table data.

That doesn't sound like a good plan - even if the clients cannot connect
yet, you can still promote the server. Just not taking delay into
consideration at that point seems like it would possibly surprise users
rather badly in situations they really cannot use such surprises.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund	                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers