Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YuORD-0004xC-Qe for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:02:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YuORD-0008As-AA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:02:47 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YuORB-00089D-Oa for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:02:45 +0000 Received: from mail.anarazel.de ([217.115.131.40]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOR9-0001mQ-44 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:02:45 +0000 Received: from intern.anarazel.de (unknown [184.23.178.130]) (Authenticated sender: andres@anarazel.de) by mail.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 899B8860001; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:02:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:02:39 +0200 From: Andres Freund To: Tom Lane Cc: Alvaro Herrera , Marko Tiikkaja , Andres Freund , hackers Subject: Re: ERROR: cannot GetMultiXactIdMembers() during recovery Message-ID: <20150518170239.GW9584@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <54EB3283.2080305@joh.to> <20150223141300.GB30784@awork2.anarazel.de> <5555F1E2.5080104@joh.to> <20150518164803.GP2523@alvh.no-ip.org> <22166.1431968387@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22166.1431968387@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 2015-05-18 12:59:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > If the former, maybe we should take the risk of fixing it today > (the patch certainly looks safe enough). But if it's been this > way a long time and nobody noticed till now, I'd agree with waiting. It's a old regression, and nobody noticed it until Marko a couple months back. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers