Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOjj-0005pN-A1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:21:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOji-0004Mf-R7 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:21:54 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOjh-0004MZ-Ne for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:21:53 +0000 Received: from mail.anarazel.de ([217.115.131.40]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOje-0002nu-Vu for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:21:52 +0000 Received: from intern.anarazel.de (unknown [184.23.178.130]) (Authenticated sender: andres@anarazel.de) by mail.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A95D860001; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:21:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:21:47 +0200 From: Andres Freund To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Tom Lane , Marko Tiikkaja , Andres Freund , hackers Subject: Re: ERROR: cannot GetMultiXactIdMembers() during recovery Message-ID: <20150518172147.GX9584@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <54EB3283.2080305@joh.to> <20150223141300.GB30784@awork2.anarazel.de> <5555F1E2.5080104@joh.to> <20150518164803.GP2523@alvh.no-ip.org> <22166.1431968387@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150518171351.GR2523@alvh.no-ip.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150518171351.GR2523@alvh.no-ip.org> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 2015-05-18 14:13:51 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hmm, AFAICS the problematic check was introduced by this commit: > > commit 9f1e051adefb2f29e757cf426b03db20d3f8a26d > Author: Alvaro Herrera > Date: Fri Nov 29 11:26:41 2013 -0300 > > so it isn't hot off the oven, but it is a regression. Hasn't that just changed the symptoms? I don't recall exactly, but my recollection is that the multixact code isn't ready at that point and hasn't initialized a bunch of important variables yet. Leading to errors in the SLRU etc. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers