Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyaPa-0006vX-Dp for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 06:38:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyaPZ-00042G-6o for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 06:38:25 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyaPW-00041d-8M for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 06:38:22 +0000 Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YyaPR-0007JV-T4 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 06:38:21 +0000 Received: by pdfh10 with SMTP id h10so68963933pdf.3 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 23:38:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leadboat.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VCJU6xSRB3zGaWKG+CwuoaDYqLpouLW3USvjLgcJ2w0=; b=HWNoGuocN0vOBWz2gjx6eiIeJdzZ9kvEbu9KhQkelxvUBBzSassjnYmgQ6R80hWfWy IMvyOV6ksLEqemuPXvF1NiosS7Lqw73Pt61MyUVSqq54LoSFj7cwcUyc0GInrTRwpbpW 9yi5WH3FCD0mkVLJFUr6LnBgzhCrRPJjmxxok= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=VCJU6xSRB3zGaWKG+CwuoaDYqLpouLW3USvjLgcJ2w0=; b=I90YgkMPkT6LN9L4Ebj9NSAx5nAde/LEhYB57+ghQkmdV2/g2KZHKsmmtAkUl34uaS wJSht5Wbq9rRrZDX5iy+imCubX0onAAqYXYg22zZt/0pib9EAvXoIE28OS520/IL/bHa 9BYQ1jkGnDwBtJC+dK7UQjekGsoqqnFaOVTsJoHdPTKCNkW6mUUCACHuWaNhrcqJbe8I XO0cfE5V7q+HBLu+yFKQfJ068q65EBv+4IaaAGmfxP4fnD79v9/av1sTx0/mLbJdNVBN /86PG10gsMRPpCyBL8Ja7/z0BWn+v2Zk0tYowFin2kH4+F1iiuyFQWXvB9DqbD6kbhSo Pf7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCq/C6EdxxkC3btkG+kWc8Zei+E8If3hHOOnMPKxGpzA9HN6IDYv74Ntu8VPkGTpuCJvBs X-Received: by 10.68.103.164 with SMTP id fx4mr21432748pbb.125.1432967894121; Fri, 29 May 2015 23:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tornado.leadboat.com (c-98-248-47-228.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.248.47.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qo1sm6252486pbc.89.2015.05.29.23.38.12 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2015 23:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 02:38:10 -0400 From: Noah Misch To: Tom Lane Cc: Stephen Frost , Bruce Momjian , Magnus Hagander , Robert Haas , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , pgsql-core Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release Message-ID: <20150530063810.GA4152014@tornado.leadboat.com> References: <20150529185431.GG26667@tamriel.snowman.net> <26984.1432927977@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150529195609.GD16602@momjian.us> <20150529195751.GN26667@tamriel.snowman.net> <27697.1432929660@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27697.1432929660@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:01:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost writes: > > * Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote: > >> I am unclear if we are anywhere near ready for beta1 even in June. Are > >> we? > > > I'm all about having that discussion... but can we do it on another > > thread or at least wait til we've decided about the back-branch > > releases? They are clearly the more important issue to consider. > > It's the same discussion though, ie what releases are we expecting to > get out in the next couple of weeks. +1 for Stephen's thought to decide about back-branch releases first and to Magnus's sentiment upthread that beta has to stand back while we schedule them. In other words, the feedback between these two scheduling decisions ought to be one-way: bringing today's supported branches to a state we can be content about deserves first pick from the calendar. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers