Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yysy0-0005sY-0H for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 02:27:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yysxy-0006Wu-Ok for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 02:27:10 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([174.143.35.229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yysxw-0006WA-AT; Sun, 31 May 2015 02:27:08 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yysvp-0004cf-9y; Sun, 31 May 2015 02:24:59 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Yysvi-0003wi-IQ; Sat, 30 May 2015 22:24:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 22:24:50 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Peter Geoghegan Cc: Tom Lane , Robert Haas , Andres Freund , Stephen Frost , Magnus Hagander , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , pgsql-core Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release Message-ID: <20150531022450.GA13697@momjian.us> References: <20150529195751.GN26667@tamriel.snowman.net> <27697.1432929660@sss.pgh.pa.us> <28477.1432931820@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150529223321.GB6535@alap3.anarazel.de> <12510.1432958887@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150530125653.GH16602@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:26:11PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Frankly, based on how I feel now, I would have no problem doing 9.5 in > > 2016 and saying we have a lot of retooling to do. We could say we have > > gotten too far out ahead of ourselves and we need to regroup and > > restructure the code. > > I wouldn't mind doing that, but I think it's premature to conclude > that it's necessary to wait quite that long to release. I agree it probably wouldn't take until 2016, but if does take until 2016, we have to be fine with that. What I am saying is we can't just continue to focus on hitting target dates and assume everything will be fine, because it isn't. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers