Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz5UB-00089k-Bg for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:49:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz5U9-0002AZ-EY for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:49:13 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz5U6-0002AQ-IY for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:49:10 +0000 Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz5U3-0002aV-5J for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:49:08 +0000 Received: by pdjm12 with SMTP id m12so6742706pdj.3 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 08:49:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leadboat.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4Unnv+Q6XUH3CDHej38DZUEH+F1kB0D/KyH1M3TtvrY=; b=ObOXZCBoAdmYzHX+LHnASdvhpOzp5oXOqMobs9+xraDgmQ+8kxlk+MTO3aDfruydvy ot5tD+OpUUOx9OphpNXYUJiptXjc+5kL4EPLjfiIG920NL/LCnAO5a9voTdl37ls+OmL BPhBKrOGkopqW1sDGrsHVEmZsmrZ8TpDRL3Ek= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=4Unnv+Q6XUH3CDHej38DZUEH+F1kB0D/KyH1M3TtvrY=; b=Vfnd8AFshqyl8z2yBMz4UGogIYYvARqH7cjFZzASb/uBhV5o/rbNhkIVTOVXNZRDC+ mqs5MEa+YJy6Hr34aG5jbEIAjsf+vKTQUmnLMwyphGBJCX5G0HDiNjuewKl3gy73rWYc nPKwMP0tT1ygpQsiJEEcxlxzitI/G4RIL5DbIVrW/iESxygOnB3YPd4xRbSYMWvI/r5n pKLWpc/FNeTz/OhOUZugLoYBBHz0m+Df6E4BOQ0tBZzDt2RKQQw6Qok3CDJ8sPWilowV 2wY3px/h18aM9Vq/lsA4KtvK2G+hSyW5Skflw402wej2jDXyEcTj4SoagJtTs1A4uccJ KLDA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkgkYpoqIIjdc9honBPpYQLDa+4zA89lrcPwiyyLg9RP60WsT9AcqXpb0uEIqAEY0bqk9Qh X-Received: by 10.66.101.9 with SMTP id fc9mr32319154pab.37.1433087345500; Sun, 31 May 2015 08:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tornado.leadboat.com (c-98-248-47-228.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.248.47.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a10sm11597437pbu.15.2015.05.31.08.49.03 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 31 May 2015 08:49:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 11:49:02 -0400 From: Noah Misch To: David Steele Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Robert Haas , Bruce Momjian , Tom Lane , Andres Freund , Stephen Frost , Magnus Hagander , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , pgsql-core Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release Message-ID: <20150531154902.GA4798@tornado.leadboat.com> References: <20150529223321.GB6535@alap3.anarazel.de> <12510.1432958887@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150530154559.GA25053@momjian.us> <556A3E26.8070902@pgmasters.net> <556A5805.5060309@commandprompt.com> <556A6908.8080600@pgmasters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556A6908.8080600@pgmasters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:51:04PM -0400, David Steele wrote: > On 5/30/15 8:38 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 05/30/2015 03:48 PM, David Steele wrote: > >> I would argue Heikki's WAL stuff is a perfect case for releasing a > >> public alpha/beta soon. I'd love to test PgBackRest with an "official" > >> 9.5dev build. The PgBackRest test suite has lots of tests that run on > >> versions 8.3+ and might well shake out any bugs that are lying around. > > > > You are right. Clone git, run it nightly automated and please, please > > report anything you find. There is no reason for a tagged release for > > that. Consider it a custom, purpose built, build-test farm. > > Sure - I can write code to do that. But then why release a beta at all? It's largely for the benefit of folks planning manual, or otherwise high-cost, testing. If you budget for just one big test per year, make it a test of beta1. For inexpensive testing, you may as well ignore beta and test git master daily or weekly. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers