Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZY1Q0-00054J-1S for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 00:33:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZY1Py-0007k6-A9 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 00:33:18 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZY1Of-0006GH-Nj for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 00:31:57 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZY1Od-0002cj-0S for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 00:31:56 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZY1OV-0005yI-8A; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 20:31:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 20:31:47 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Stephen Frost Cc: Greg Stark , Robert Haas , Josh Berkus , Peter Eisentraut , Heikki Linnakangas , Michael Paquier , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication Message-ID: <20150905003147.GD21484@momjian.us> References: <20150813013607.GS3685@tamriel.snowman.net> <55CCE12B.4030306@agliodbs.com> <20150818140637.GI3685@tamriel.snowman.net> <20150818180730.GT3685@tamriel.snowman.net> <20150904194819.GE26916@momjian.us> <20150904205133.GB3685@tamriel.snowman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150904205133.GB3685@tamriel.snowman.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 04:51:33PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Coming in late, but can you explain how multiple passwords allow for > > easier automated credential rotation? If you have five applications > > with stored passwords, I imagine you can't change them all at once, so > > with multiples you could change it on one, then go to the others and > > change it there, and finally, remove the old password. Is that the > > process? I am not realizing that without multiple plasswords, this is a > > hard problem. > > That's exactly the process if multiple passwords can be used. If > there's only one account and one password supported then you have to > change all the systems all at once and that certainly can be a hard > problem. > > One way to deal with this is to have a bunch of different accounts, but > that's certainly not simple either and can get quite painful. OK, for me, if we can explain the benefit for users, it seems worth doing just to allow that. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers