Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPwu-0000dT-7U for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:11:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPwt-00071D-LR for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:11:11 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPvY-0004VZ-HV for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:09:48 +0000 Received: from mail.anarazel.de ([217.115.131.40]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPvW-00053a-CL for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:09:48 +0000 Received: from intern.anarazel.de (host100-173-static.2-79-b.business.telecomitalia.it [79.2.173.100]) (Authenticated sender: andres@anarazel.de) by mail.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A576860001; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 02:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 02:09:43 +0200 From: Andres Freund To: David Fetter Cc: Tom Lane , Robert Haas , Thomas Munro , Jeff Janes , Alvaro Herrera , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain Message-ID: <20151023000943.GP14196@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <51382.1445549813@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20151022221425.GB22539@fetter.org> <53412.1445555106@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20151022232610.GC22539@fetter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151022232610.GC22539@fetter.org> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 2015-10-22 16:26:10 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > To be affective negatively by libreadline's viral license, an entity > would need to fork the psql client in proprietary ways that they did > not wish not to make available to end users, at the same time linking > in libreadline. > Maybe I'm missing something big, but I really don't see people out > there shipping a libreadline-enabled psql client, details of whose > source they'd want to keep a deep, dark secret. Isn't that just about every proprietary fork of postgres? Most have added backend features and I guess many of those have in turn added support to psql for those features. Sure it'd probably in reality be relatively harmless for them to release these psql modifications, but I rather doubt their management will generally see it that way. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers