Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZbr-0003Xz-Ae for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:49:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZbp-0003Bc-MN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:49:25 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZbp-0003BV-FY for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:49:25 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZbm-0007UA-OA; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:49:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03KGnKSA020158; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:49:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Victor Yegorov cc: PostgreSQL Developers , "Jonathan S. Katz" Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? In-reply-to: References: <20200416230304.GA28390@alvherre.pgsql> <17560.1587083109@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26009.1587302581@sss.pgh.pa.us> <10100.1587315592@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Victor Yegorov message dated "Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:38:46 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20156.1587401360.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:49:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20157.1587401360@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Victor Yegorov writes: > While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with > operators. BTW, I think a big part of the problem with table 9.4 as it's being rendered in the web style right now is that the type placeholders (numeric_type etc) are being rendered in a ridiculously overemphasized fashion, causing them to overwhelm all else. Do we really want to be rendered that way? I'd think plain italic, comparable to the rendering of , would be more appropriate. I could make this page use for that purpose of course, but it seems like semantically the wrong thing. regards, tom lane