Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
 by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from
 <pgsql-hackers-owner+M288400=pgsql-hackers-arkari@postgresql.org>)
 id 1aHFsd-0001S0-7U
 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 19:05:51 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org)
 by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from
 <pgsql-hackers-owner+M288400=pgsql-hackers-arkari@postgresql.org>)
 id 1aHFsc-0001cR-OU
 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 19:05:50 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229])
 by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
 id 1aHFrI-0005an-Px
 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 19:04:28 +0000
Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com ([8.23.224.60])
 by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
 id 1aHFrF-0000ps-Oy
 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 19:04:27 +0000
X-No-IP: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp
X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com
Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [200.104.53.52])
 (Authenticated sender: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp)
 by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FED4401182;
 Thu,  7 Jan 2016 11:04:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 693A0398; Thu,  7 Jan 2016 16:04:21 -0300 (CLT)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:04:21 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
 Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Message-ID: <20160107190421.GA448981@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <568EA3A6.7080309@BlueTreble.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-ID: <pgsql-hackers.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Jim Nasby wrote:

> Also worth noting: the only reason I'm using pg_regress is it's the easiest
> way to get a test cluster. If not for that, I'd just use pg_prove since I'm
> already using pgTap.

In 9.5 you might want to "use PostgresNode" which allows you to initdb
and such.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers