Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aHKS0-0007C3-G1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:58:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHKS0-0004qn-1l for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:58:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHKRy-0004ps-KV for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:58:38 +0000 Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com ([8.23.224.60]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHKRr-0007Ak-BJ for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:58:37 +0000 X-No-IP: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [186.9.93.26]) (Authenticated sender: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 09C9F4011B2; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CBE822C0; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:58:25 -0300 (CLT) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:58:25 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: "David E. Wheeler" Cc: Jim Nasby , Tom Lane , Peter Eisentraut , Robert Haas , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS Message-ID: <20160107235825.GA550344@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8DB510BE-4E06-4FAF-8719-54747E48FAE5@justatheory.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > > >>> Also worth noting: the only reason I'm using pg_regress is it's the easiest > >>> way to get a test cluster. If not for that, I'd just use pg_prove since I'm > >>> already using pgTap. > >> > >> In 9.5 you might want to "use PostgresNode" which allows you to initdb > >> and such. > > > > Oooh, thanks! I might well just copy that into my pgxntool utility. > > Is this documented somewhere? Not in detail. Patches welcome; see the "regress-tap" sect1 in doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml. > If it’s Perl, seems like it’d only be useful for those of us who compile from source, yes? Feel free to submit patches for discussion to install the modules. We already install pg_regress under lib/pgxs/src/test/regress/ so I see no reason we couldn't install the Perl test modules somewhere. If you hurry you can still make it to 9.6's last commitfest. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers