Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkYkS-0003Zk-OM for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkYkS-0003z6-B5 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:48 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkYkR-0003z0-QS for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:47 +0000 Received: from smtprelay0049.b.hostedemail.com ([64.98.42.49] helo=smtprelay.b.hostedemail.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkYkK-0005Xa-I7 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:47 +0000 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.248.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.248]) by smtprelay01.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E86D2D2BA1; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 616C76686572726540616C76682E6E6F2D69702E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 50,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:800:960:966:967:968:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1312:1313:1314:1345:1359:1381:1437:1515:1516:1518:1519:1534:1541:1593:1594:1595:1596:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2196:2199:2393:2525:2553:2565:2682:2685:2693:2828:2829:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4321:4385:4605:5007:6261:7875:8957:9025:9121:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12048:12438:12663:12740:13069:13311:13357:13436:13439:13894:13895:14181:14721:14764:14777:21080:21366:21433:21451:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:3,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: rake59_8581fb7e8d952 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2371 Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [216.155.90.98]) (Authenticated sender: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) by omf01.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52C29792; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:38:35 -0300 (CLST) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:38:35 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Christoph Berg , Heikki Linnakangas , Michael Paquier , Andreas Karlsson , Victor Wagner , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tom Lane Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more Message-ID: <20160915153835.GA507447@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160915143311.wiergigqmi5ink34@msg.df7cb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Michael Paquier 2016-09-15 > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > I backpatched this to 9.5, but not further than that. The functions this > > > modified were moved around in 9.5, so the patch wouldn't apply as is. It > > > wouldn't be difficult to back-patch further if there's demand, but I'm not > > > eager to do that until someone complains. > > > > Not going older than 9.5 may be fine: > > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2014/12/23/the-new-release-strategy/ > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/OpenSSL > > As far as I can see 1.0.2 would be supported until Dec 2019, so that > > would just overlap with 9.4's EOL. > > I'm afraid it's not that easy - Debian 9 (stretch) will release at the > beginning of next year, and apt.postgresql.org will want to build > 9.2/9.3/9.4 for that distribution. I guess yum.postgresql.org will > have the same problem with the next Fedora release. I suppose some interested party could grab the patch that Heikki committed to the new branches and produce a back-patch that can be applied to the older branches. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers