Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bobaJ-0007Ei-Gq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:29:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bobaI-0004Xy-ST for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:29:02 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bobYu-0002BA-Fv for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:27:36 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([2001:4830:167b::11]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bobYs-0005oi-16 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:27:35 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 309305F7A2; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:27:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:27:33 -0400 From: Stephen Frost To: Jeevan Chalke Cc: Robert Haas , Tom Lane , Alvaro Herrera , Thom Brown , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Add support for restrictive RLS policies Message-ID: <20160926192733.GI5148@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <20160908183544.GU4028@tamriel.snowman.net> <20160908192157.GA53172@alvherre.pgsql> <20160908200912.GW4028@tamriel.snowman.net> <5611.1473369685@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20160912015748.GF11453@tamriel.snowman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-Info: http://www.snowman.net X-Operating-System: Linux/3.13.0-91-generic (x86_64) X-Uptime: 15:21:02 up 79 days, 20:45, 16 users, load average: 0.13, 0.12, 0.11 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org --0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeevan, * Jeevan Chalke (jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com) wrote: > I have started reviewing this patch and here are couple of points I have > observed so far: >=20 > 1. Patch applies cleanly > 2. make / make install / initdb all good. > 3. make check (regression) FAILED. (Attached diff file for reference). I've re-based my patch on top of current head and still don't see the failures which you are getting during the regression tests. Is it possible you were doing the tests without a full rebuild of the source tree..? Can you provide details of your build/test environment and the full regression before and after output? Thanks! Stephen --0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX6XakAAoJEO1sijiDR2RV0GwP+gIcmuKE9Ou3auZX2MRpAKIP 5Ux9AEk0HgEi0dkugtW8JD0z445dP8bm+30y3t57+E05dTBpSZeM+1hV7PkzO197 s+eXufLUosjfB9MiRChz5c4yeo2kSWwbxj8/qPsKEbqIFvbJ3FznOnz/kujEhyrV SKoNNT7v+4+cEi8P1JaFUJ19IbneVztc+H2C8jUgAeop+9FJ6SOLnBaawgt8IAxg 8oDoV0MvSP1i9shLaHXPW546qCaMk9Yn/7rf3JhOVQBwd124WF0/TkenomL+9jan g07q4vqTTP6WAtq4XTAjJqr5e2WyzuEBVO4O8/8CfHeTWoGpBq1D9ZNujw6phW5q O+GmZn+SWg5/rAwOfiB5HP1U6rYWGi0a07ru5x3jJXUbhzKn6pO4SphQISspy8uD 0nSmO+M+yRToH+o6wbk4HBNtm8PUrSgRbddtUGLLUxEzQTrGkEx+TqxJu6Wc6hGs zLmF+dAGzFW+QQxlDx/uR5/cfCkmLaDd1ZXJmBzN9SvSiew8QVkKlF1RjtWBzJmd rg1X5PcNCArUUgJeuzD6cprcXMDRn+ZRcON3COnHvM62rCgqEGFJjsZeNAYOd7BM LFI7OGYwWLZWzx7w/+zWObItjxRtNgqMFKpnNdYJOaw5AQez8X15Ws/ADObBW/Rq 6b1SpMKum4NzbMajNEGs =zDE/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD--