Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciTzC-0001rw-EG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:41:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciTzB-0001z1-W0 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:41:42 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciTzA-0001xf-D6 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:41:40 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciTz6-000483-SF for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:41:39 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciTyo-0008ED-0z; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:41:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:41:18 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: Michael Paquier , Andreas Karlsson , Andres Freund , Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , Jim Nasby , PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 Message-ID: <20170227224118.GF421@momjian.us> References: <4b6b0b72-94c8-79ad-baf1-b01587807315@proxel.se> <68cd9337-90ab-c654-ed6b-a32abc26e147@proxel.se> <1da61300-31e8-d416-1d41-56c15cd4753d@proxel.se> <083ea668-538e-06ae-c1a7-37b0edbeeb9c@proxel.se> <20170227202916.GC421@momjian.us> <4131.1488234681@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4131.1488234681@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:31:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: > > I don't object to the addition of this patch in next CF as this > > presents no new concept. Still per the complications this patch and > > because it is a complicated patch I was wondering if people are fine > > to include it in this last CF. > > The March CF is already looking pretty daunting. We can try to include > this but I won't be too surprised if it gets punted to a future CF. Yeah, that was my reaction too. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers