Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:26:43 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>,
	"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
	Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>,
	PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:
 \quit_if, \quit_unless)
Message-ID: <20170319172643.asukyqvva724phnz@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703191812040.4878@lancre>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170206-195-7adf12 (1.7.2)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Fabien COELHO wrote:
> 
> Hello Corey,
> 
> > v24 highlights:
> 
> The v24 patch is twice larger that the previous submission. Sigh.

The reason this is so large is that there is an entangled refactoring
patch, splitting the exec_command() function from one giant switch()
into one routine for each command.  It's up to the committer whether to
do it all in one patch, or to request this to be split into a
refactoring patch plus another adding functionality on top.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers