Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctckD-0000my-6F for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctckC-0000uH-MB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:16 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctckB-0000u7-Hh for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:15 +0000 Received: from mail.postgrespro.ru ([93.174.131.138]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctck4-0008Az-LW for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:16:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.postgrespro.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBBC21C21FE; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:16:06 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at postgrespro.ru Received: from localhost (unknown [208.123.164.34]) by mail.postgrespro.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6369E21C0647; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:16:06 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=postgrespro.ru; s=mail; t=1490890566; bh=FaIA2MnfkvvaT0U8us6CtWX5HXjMdsLo6OXBQ0tTbF0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ATY7BntB067frGiNUe9Fx8jfUcfPO5MxOELzqEnKNN8TFP4GScofC1pkVJck6Nmeg VzqSd++sG1ehO2umdAMbOrocoPj/3wZiiY1XSaRFxwOmNZKgnRT0WdwS4vCKtiIHx1 LC5bFgIn/C0IcU28zwdXgmDkwINNI3FQEFIOo+JQ= Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:12:36 +0300 From: Aleksander Alekseev To: Teodor Sigaev Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Anastasia Lubennikova , Peter Geoghegan , David Steele , Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Message-ID: <20170330161235.GA1678@e733.localdomain> References: <56168952.4010101@postgrespro.ru> <46e1f13e-6887-3851-a525-f046029341eb@postgrespro.ru> <20170324124709.22419.51178.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Teodor, > I had a look on patch and played with it, seems, it looks fine. I splitted > it to two patches: core changes (+bloom index fix) and btree itself. All > docs are left in first patch - I'm too lazy to rewrite documentation which > is changed in second patch. > Any objection from reviewers to push both patches? These patches look OK. Definitely no objections from me. --=20 Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEECAokn0QZCoIHW4GpEEnCBLXCDtYFAljdLnAACgkQEEnCBLXC DtZPnhAA7LckQhtb2T3opUjRM/4dg9Hb95LoI/WUXDUhg+V6g7xl2PFmDlsTO81e C0XaXDfqOVX11n3KzXeQlVDL92okDMpgFKlnxzOSGWjwyOs2kATb6I+z28JnfIIE SK5b6qIaFJq8KJcwrgNTTFJxnUm3e7g4eyMnE4uL4fG6rF2laDV9h92xfQ1lHzOV tUHTYvz0cyTXqpTN4s3fUAZJ7E9fn/Fd5o+nh8BuBkreN5nqFad9qA1Tokb2l+2s 0kxhG7z7rYVEXz3/peOspPiSz6dMuwKanBT8h+6ZAriygDDLxzg5wmUwDqOvHChO LJ5RUccgOcuaRI/dp8+n2OZqFmuJAd9fq7NUmFZkjnFBjyiaq6NKjJfXsLxl2G8P UpTPL7uMKmAqUBQxYkKbiIWXEaIMPqOZzxwOCJ/ihFMv8BS2sWUI2jFKbvFgQ/Y/ lqD0yRZiXaRG5q0l3ngC4Yr4c2Q9srVkSo948NxtVSoJkc3Vxb4+12DFQqrUJBeu bi/q8oD7mlGxAkisAKeDc/rUfmeAy6H0UAVGWJCVPR0n3lkA8/rMZNy+GIeviMnJ QQCIwOpqXcNjfokdAZTNzmqepZCkd0NWzdv5cjt4y/WYJ4HlPwQZ3u9w9Ka+rE1O RidNcQK6U3iljQnuUUO8Y+fwU5TsKkOgVi6MdHXlW+AvNMN7Pbs= =+ZvW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--