Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN9Pa-0000bo-Bz for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 03:01:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN9PZ-0002if-Ob for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 03:01:01 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN9O1-0008L0-A9 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 02:59:25 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN9Nx-0003Rt-7D for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 02:59:24 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN9Nv-0007co-3M; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 22:59:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 22:59:19 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Sergey Burladyan Cc: PostgreSQL-development , Amit Kapila , Dmitriy Sarafannikov , Vladimir Borodin Subject: Re: Broken hint bits (freeze) Message-ID: <20170620025919.GA28277@momjian.us> References: <20170613193124.GQ13873@momjian.us> <87mv98af8j.fsf@seb.koffice.internal> <20170616164641.GP11450@momjian.us> <87fuezalc3.fsf@seb.koffice.internal> <20170619222113.GF3180@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:50:29AM +0300, Sergey Burladyan wrote: > 20 июн. 2017 г. 1:21 пользователь "Bruce Momjian" написал:  > > > We are saying that Log-Shipping should match "Latest checkpoint > location", but the WAL for that will not be sent to the standby, so it > will not match, but that is OK since the only thing in the non-shipped > WAL file is the checkpoint record.  How should we modify the wording on > this? > > > I am afraid that without this checkpoint record standby cannot make > restartpoint > and without restartpoint it does not sync shared buffers into disk at > shutdown.  Uh, as I understand it the rsync is going to copy the missing WAL file from the new master to the standby, right, and I think pg_controldata too, so it should be fine. Have you tested to see if it fails? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers