Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:04:59 -0700
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
Subject: Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
Message-ID: <20170728050459.GC2608921@rfd.leadboat.com>
References: <12302.1500132157@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20170717072629.dqykbsot2irdob7c@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <20170717145710.cm32m4yn555hsoxd@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <3979.1500407153@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20170718200410.254wlnzpmzxwskor@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <20170724061019.GA2284350@rfd.leadboat.com>
 <76DA69C4-80AE-4717-9D34-7086D834A7C0@anarazel.de>
 <20170727022932.GC2284350@rfd.leadboat.com>
 <20170728044657.GA2611600@rfd.leadboat.com>
 <20170728044918.3nro7o7k4lia5pa5@alap3.anarazel.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170728044918.3nro7o7k4lia5pa5@alap3.anarazel.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:49:18PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-07-27 21:46:57 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 02:29:32AM +0000, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 08:04:30AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On July 24, 2017 7:10:19 AM GMT+01:00, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > > > >On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:04:10PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > >> Ok, I'll flesh out the patch till Thursday.  But I do think we're
> > > > >going
> > > > >> to have to do something about the back branches, too.
> > > > >
> > > > >This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. 
> > > > >Kindly send
> > > > >a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
> > > > >status
> > > > >update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > > > >https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> > > > 
> > > > I sent out a note fleshed out patch last week, which Tom reviewed. Planning to update it to address that review today or tomorrow.
> > > 
> > > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> > > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > > update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> > 
> > IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
> > for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
> > item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
> > 2017-07-29 05:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
> > ownership without further notice.
> > 
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> 
> I've updated the patch based on review (today). Awaiting new review.
> 
> FWIW, I don't see the point of these messages when there is a new patch
> version posted today.

The policy says, "Each update shall state a date when the community will
receive another update".  Nothing you've sent today specifies a deadline for
your next update, so your ownership of this item remains out of compliance.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers