Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKVkc-0001hl-UY for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:48:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKVkb-0008Px-8n for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:48:05 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKVka-0008Pn-OE for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:48:05 +0000 Received: from mail.postgrespro.ru ([93.174.131.138]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eKVkX-0002KO-8I for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:48:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.postgrespro.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBB621C1CE2; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:47:58 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at postgrespro.ru Received: from arthur.localdomain (ppp91-76-167-87.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [91.76.167.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.postgrespro.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5BC521C176B; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:47:57 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=postgrespro.ru; s=mail; t=1512074877; bh=uVURjmu35VZRuxVRxdxZ1W7BGCZfAjwNGaHCUsAghLg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Haht98vGB/TZqXfNFof4kYvtQapZAlhXFiGJqbY7iweHMtkua+z/t2ykAFxkgAmyJ 7gHHWpbzyhjERL4YvMa5VYdi8YCC6mRpLalhKAiHrmn+zGxhsgFKWNYKPmeWvIDDNQ 6fvcsF2QGWOYpIBtHv1rusTSgM6AyxvRUJ6cdQS8= Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:47:56 +0300 From: Arthur Zakirov To: Robert Haas Cc: Michael Paquier , Tom Lane , amul sul , Pavel Stehule , "David G. Johnston" , Alex Ignatov , Bruce Momjian , amul sul , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Message-ID: <20171130204755.GA13027@arthur.localdomain> References: <29142.1475097531@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8744.1478284597@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29637.1511045306@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20171119144734.GA12415@arthur.localdomain> <9091.1511112399@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20171122152334.GA571@zakirov.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:39:56AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > So is it now the case that all of the regression test cases in this > patch produce the same results as they would on Oracle? > Yes, exactly. All new cases give the same result as in Oracle, except text of error messages. -- Arthur Zakirov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company