Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 23:25:28 -0500
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>,
	"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Message-ID: <20180105042528.GK2416@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <16db4468-edfa-830a-f921-39a50498e77e@2ndquadrant.com>
 <19990.1500936945@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3d250597-384e-c5f4-7533-b513e366888f@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAJrrPGeQcsBXhuJA1vQ25PS0wAqfo0v_mXtwmt4VcOmxKSvfCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <94f58897-861b-accf-a9f1-af4be816c0d3@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAJrrPGfTQ3w=5BdprWgQghuM7ujtBy2Sthr6zRwY0QeRBQd2RQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <13097.1509650125@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3dca6a76-fa4b-66ab-c0db-496335d650b1@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAB7nPqS4VSUiaFnGmR2k95-RtEi++SEwZk32pMu_31VLyMpK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dXvN/oL/yBWKZMaf"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB7nPqS4VSUiaFnGmR2k95-RtEi++SEwZk32pMu_31VLyMpK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk


--dXvN/oL/yBWKZMaf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tomas,

* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for looking into this. I agree your patch is more consistent and
> > generally cleaner.
>=20
> This is classified as a bug fix, and is marked as waiting on author. I
> am moving it to next CF as work continues.

This is still in waiting-on-author state; it'd be great to get your
thoughts on where this patch is and what the next steps are to move it
forward.  If you need additional feedback or there needs to be more
discussion (perhaps with Tom) then maybe this should be in needs-review
instead, but it'd be great if you could review the discussion and patch
again and at least provide an update on it (last update from you was in
November).

Thanks!

Stephen

--dXvN/oL/yBWKZMaf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=0tJv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dXvN/oL/yBWKZMaf--