Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXxJF-0007mV-NB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 22:51:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXxJE-0004Ir-S5 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 22:51:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXxJE-0004Ih-Kw for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 22:51:24 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([96.255.250.162]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXxJ9-0004KM-UT for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 22:51:23 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B37D15F79C; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 17:51:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 17:51:18 -0500 From: Stephen Frost To: Konstantin Knizhnik Cc: Michael Paquier , PostgreSQL mailing lists , tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization Message-ID: <20180106225118.GS2416@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <4bd78cd4-1e64-5294-2eb8-3d061b20288f@postgrespro.ru> <8eed9c23-19ba-5404-7a9e-0584b836b3f3@postgrespro.ru> <283dfb96-48c2-1a87-90ab-97ca87b237fe@postgrespro.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6nDMFZtLDsaWTCbA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --6nDMFZtLDsaWTCbA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, * Konstantin Knizhnik (k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru) wrote: > On 30.11.2017 04:59, Michael Paquier wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik > > wrote: > >>One more patch passing all regression tests with autoprepare_threshold= =3D1. > >>I still do not think that it should be switch on by default... > >This patch does not apply, and did not get any reviews. So I am moving > >it to next CF with waiting on author as status. Please provide a > >rebased version. Tsunakawa-san, you are listed as a reviewer of this > >patch. If you are not planning to look at it anymore, you may want to > >remove your name from the related CF entry > >https://commitfest.postgresql.org/16/1150/. >=20 > Updated version of the patch is attached. This patch appears to apply with just a bit of fuzz and make check passes, so I'm not sure why this is currently marked as 'Waiting for author'. I've updated it to be 'Needs review'. If that's incorrect, feel free to change it back with an explanation. Thanks! Stephen --6nDMFZtLDsaWTCbA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaUVLmAAoJEO1sijiDR2RVwcQP/1PpazR/Bn4JAP1qmfYl13Ly mqgXXJxNmbELL/ag0tJrl3TF7p2f311jd3jbmwEceppNlYz43oqvl/g0t6ZzE26A yLO54kQtU8H2nli6wExkYYj9HsUTjHeKm3qL7a+6Xks6ZuySzczGDHvP/lnrKcN3 tLK/JrVoQnk4b8mmlkNHWfePajM5tZtGgvFZQbk1D8Ukq/KhfQU8xtPlJY5KI8Gv WGbvdYfX/0WKa1Wr8epVQa9/RQ3DqQGA/okVypNC1+xcBi+ZpOiarnSMkln19XNW vg8Jj7515ciqCdPr/W4WDWv/IGnb8ZyJ53V0ubsVIo0zTnopDVFteKxw6HfD1LH3 4nCZPJthJuZo1b1qfi8s0uxAcPXljUIK20/X3ncAJSuWloqCRwzPa7y84COizpfG D7VmYB2opsZhMnf3rvq5SAUbms8L7EKB/WBBUZi9kt+gOQmj2rLc3315XiKiDK12 Kls4JvEci5RUXkVUqplj23i9Zyn4Txdm+xBvr+B3WTVmC8Tga7fCsBmNoaWUHOyW yBVb8yhlWr+dJojmP1G018h7MvXWFwtPUD9hXb3r+GzBo1OhLIyVUM9kp2/OC6La 2IJnWQ/jclJqHVdTsHtNXrafEmCxCqndEbjbfZ+Gj/umel0nhX2ISMlbre0T0X+z UdvoGXXuNHe4mI1ZvpJp =BcZE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6nDMFZtLDsaWTCbA--