Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecBZX-0000KY-GP for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecBZX-0000YC-0B for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:43 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecBZW-0000Y3-Py for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:42 +0000 Received: from mx.wagner.pp.ru ([2a01:4f8:c17:2e5b::2]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ecBZT-0006VT-Sa for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:42 +0000 Received: from fafnir.local.vm (unknown [93.174.131.141]) by mx.wagner.pp.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1A57E0047 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:53:36 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:53:35 +0300 From: Victor Wagner To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 Message-ID: <20180118175335.2c250367@fafnir.local.vm> In-Reply-To: <26312.1516258066@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <0d3a9fa264cebe1cb9966f37b7c06e86@postgrespro.ru> <20180111173938.jimybeayp2u5mmup@alap3.anarazel.de> <31a342fa6a025a8bdfc5b8b19c29d56d@postgrespro.ru> <1232.1515780057@sss.pgh.pa.us> <15299.1515867055@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18209.1516059711@sss.pgh.pa.us> <90ab676392c8f9c84431976147097cf0@postgrespro.ru> <17897.1516202926@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1c70bab595a37ffa3a7fafea29fa6f55@postgrespro.ru> <31743.1516206789@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20180118094049.10293b39@fafnir.local.vm> <26312.1516258066@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:47:46 -0500 Tom Lane wrote: > Victor Wagner writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > checking for __int128 alignment bug... ok > > As far as I understand your patch, there should be: > > checking for __int128 alignment bug... broken > > Yes, that's what I expected to happen. It seems that I've made some unreproducible mistake last night applying your patch. Marina repeapplied it later and everything works. I'we cherrypicked in as far back as 9.5, and with these versions it works too.