Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ep3AK-0000cC-59 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:32:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ep3AI-0003zk-JE for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:32:50 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ep3AI-0003za-CV for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:32:50 +0000 Received: from smtprelay0175.b.hostedemail.com ([64.98.42.175] helo=smtprelay.b.hostedemail.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ep3AE-0004v6-9z for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:32:49 +0000 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.248.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.248]) by smtprelay02.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86856D382E; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:32:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 616C76686572726540616C76682E6E6F2D69702E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 90,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:967:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1312:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1519:1534:1539:1593:1594:1595:1596:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2560:2563:2682:2685:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3865:3867:3868:3871:3872:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4362:4605:5007:6261:7903:8957:9025:9040:9121:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12296:12533:12663:12740:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:13894:13895:14764:21080:21324:21611:21627:21740:30054:30091,0,RBL:190.121.34.242:@alvh.no-ip.org:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.14.63.100 64.201.201.201,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:no-ip.org-dnsbl7.mailshell.net-127.4.0.190,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:75,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: trip61_17b10c0b8d027 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1674 Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [190.121.34.242]) (Authenticated sender: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) by omf01.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93BA831F; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 23:32:40 -0300 (-03) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 23:32:40 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Amit Langote Cc: Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , Pg Hackers , Simon Riggs Subject: Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables Message-ID: <20180223023240.wi5ywiormeqqxko7@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Amit Langote wrote: > On 2018/02/23 8:52, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > We could mitigate the performance loss to some extent by adding more to > > RelationData. For example, a "is_partition" boolean would help: skip > > searching pg_inherits for a relation that is not a partition. > > Unless I'm missing something, doesn't rd_rel->relispartition help? Uh, wow, how have I missed that all this time! Yes, it probably does. I'll rework this tomorrow ... and the already committed index patch too, I think. Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services