Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:07:50 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
Message-ID: <20180309200750.ya2osrr5qbqfwzlm@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <891b78d0-4b00-4611-2000-3ce96cf73c26@2ndquadrant.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0)
Precedence: bulk

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/7/18 20:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > So, unless someone has a brilliant idea on how to construct a column
> > mapping from partitioned table to partition, I'm going back to the
> > design I was proposing earlier, ie., creating individual pg_trigger rows
> > for each partition that are essentially adjusted copies of the ones for
> > the partitioned table.
> 
> Yes, that seems easiest.
> 
> The idea of having only one pg_trigger entry was derived from the
> assumption that we wouldn't need the other ones for anything.  But if
> that doesn't apply, then it's better to just go with the straightforward
> way instead of bending the single-pg_trigger way to our will.

Agreed.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services