Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1evoVk-0005Fc-Bf for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:18:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1evoVi-0001Ds-EJ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:18:54 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1evoVi-0001Di-7B for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:18:54 +0000 Received: from smtprelay0167.b.hostedemail.com ([64.98.42.167] helo=smtprelay.b.hostedemail.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1evoVX-0002g4-N5 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:18:51 +0000 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.248.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.248]) by smtprelay05.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF6832AFC1; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:18:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 616C76686572726540616C76682E6E6F2D69702E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 90,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:967:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1312:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1519:1534:1538:1568:1593:1594:1595:1596:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2559:2563:2682:2685:2736:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3865:3866:3867:3870:3871:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4184:4605:5007:6261:8957:9025:9121:10004:10400:10848:11232:11638:11658:11914:12219:12663:13069:13071:13311:13357:13439:13894:13895:14180:14764:21060:21080:21627:30054:30074,0,RBL:179.56.29.253:@alvh.no-ip.org:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.14.63.190 64.201.201.201,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:no-ip.org-dnsbl7.mailshell.net-127.4.0.190,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:78,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: beds50_110afba35ec00 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1479 Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [179.56.29.253]) (Authenticated sender: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) by omf01.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B5E79798; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:18:34 -0300 (-03) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:18:34 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Andres Freund Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Robert Haas , Haribabu Kommi , Amit Kapila Subject: Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction Message-ID: <20180313181834.vrmgkiwidqvcjaq6@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180220224318.gw4oe5jadhpmcdnm@alap3.anarazel.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently been discussing with Robert how to abstract > TupleTableSlots in the light of upcoming developments around abstracting > storage away. Besides that aspect I think we also need to make them > more abstract to later deal with vectorized excution, but I'm more fuzzy > on the details there. Hi, is this patch proposed for pg11? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services