Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:39:57 +0900
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
	Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
Message-ID: <20180322013957.GD2490@paquier.xyz>
References: <20180126080026.GI17847@paquier.xyz>
 <7d040dbb-33f3-edb7-b13d-0f4ab607af46@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAA8=A79KwJ4Yt3C9LAMt9-i+N=jDP2Z+NoE0qh069BetX0kmCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA8=A7-xR98DkqdoTAui3i4Y17xJPrMrxYGr9KDh0Hs0qVYjMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <08724398-ce66-9236-18fc-b7f22a15c017@2ndquadrant.com>
 <18045.1520370764@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <0b59536a-2d31-7573-6505-1860d00618bd@pgmasters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0b59536a-2d31-7573-6505-1860d00618bd@pgmasters.net>
Precedence: bulk


--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:51:04AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/6/18 4:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> It seems the consensus is that we'll need a build farm update before we
> can move forward with the patch and that we don't need to wait long for
> people to upgrade.
>=20
> Andrew, do you have a date for the next release?

Even if a lighter version of this patch stripped from multi-version
support (Who uses that actually?) knowing that the buildfarm code has
its own set of modules to do the same may be a good step forward as per
the feedback of this thread people would like to unify the existing
scripts.

We could also try to figure later on how to merge the buildfarm code
into upstream and if it actually makes sense or not, which is something
I am not completely convinced is worth it.  This would remove the need
of any complicated refactoring in PostgresNode.pm to handle binary paths
for a single node, at the cost of of course removing cross-upgrade
checks from the tree.

Still I definitely agree that a release of the buildfarm client should
happen first.  9 days before the end of the commit, the window may be at
the end too short for v11.
--
Michael

--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=3b5P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl--