Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3N4F-0007Rl-HB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:37:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3N4E-00063t-4F for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:37:46 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3N4D-00063e-2S for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:37:45 +0000 Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.221]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3N48-0001DX-AL for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:37:43 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1600C1462; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:37:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:37:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=T8h8jNhMBvklb/Ov3 9N7Rk9o+rE3/oNCxrQwNqYmohE=; b=UVns5/ozN/b1TVv3WTvWbT4BBwwyB4Kq2 bO/frtr9gYtqeyu/VrrsT6s1rQ20EX9RDxHcNW+P3nIHFlSeEaznLJdzKLj6z/hB m+A5wa/G9QQVLh8kqWnS0CgtQo/EFC0NbWQ2q4J2knSBLLQZYlaMirD0LxSbeP2c V+ah05jVUsKmVnFri32+ie5czATzvWhcenGgM6cthQTHtNMoIOZJFVTaEnxuac6O 1haW2DP3CdrqlhSERM65f/7RZhSfcQKAKEYJR36EPieI/PkEWpANhSyh9plKGWng gTsrlyOOMpuo359GQj80IjoYc+AxM5jV4RBn1/A8CsqAufrFM7FGw== X-ME-Sender: Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [179.56.29.253]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6872D1028D; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:37:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8C0E71B; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:37:36 -0300 (-03) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:37:36 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tomas Vondra Cc: Stas Kelvich , Nikhil Sontakke , Andres Freund , Simon Riggs , Craig Ringer , Peter Eisentraut , Petr Jelinek , Sokolov Yura , Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Tom Lane , Masahiko Sawada , PostgreSQL Hackers , Robert Haas Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Message-ID: <20180403143736.z42lxviikrf4iyxc@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7f33efcf-d28d-cc22-3430-665adbb0dbf2@2ndquadrant.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Tomas Vondra wrote: > Yes, that is a good point actually - we need to test that replication > between PG10 and PG11 works correctly, i.e. that the protocol version is > correctly negotiated, and features are disabled/enabled accordingly etc. Maybe it'd be good to have a buildfarm animal to specifically test for that? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services