Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8S9p-0002k9-Hl for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:04:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8S9o-0004X9-68 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:04:32 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8S9n-0004Wz-VM for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:04:32 +0000 Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.221]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8S9j-00071X-Ke for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:04:31 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED7F17B0; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:04:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:04:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xikfApP2C+CD1T4tQ nrqbJHD9PbuOszuZG/tUYRWDMo=; b=hZH9fzqpH/vbg90NpsFdCzoKXRCrLLI3X 8dJ8R4F9FgZJ82r0JdlCdivUTQ1jCKI/7abzawTcxCB+UwIsV/oXV3r3vhsFjCHR CjFCpb9iyM2UEzABxWfuXJOtQM/jGcXkJdtHukbsKbw3hWapa9hQ+pjjx19UPT8z fCoPnkZMqLntkB04tWNhMqpIY7Xg8sf3/RDoRpkLTDPBwDPsMwF7jfqM6J/v/VoH dX65Tj4MUqKy06DG8JZJTXD5EML6LqJ9TS198+/rOxFVXJr01toB0rqgp4+ONtd6 39aCXly82f0vl5H4Ji2z4StD4ZqcYtfnxhigACJJbnk49dkGKKmIA== X-ME-Sender: Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [179.56.29.253]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 99287102E2; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:04:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B66895CF; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:04:23 -0300 (-03) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:04:23 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Amit Langote Cc: Pavan Deolasee , Etsuro Fujita , Andres Freund , Pg Hackers , Peter Geoghegan Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables Message-ID: <20180417150423.mkpppplrue6a7q36@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Amit Langote wrote: > I just confirmed my hunch that this wouldn't somehow do the right thing > when the OID system column is involved. Like this case: This looks too big a patch to pursue now. I'm inclined to just remove the equalTupdesc changes. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services