Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:37:41 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>,
	"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Minor comment fix for pg_config_manual.h
Message-ID: <201812280337.4a5kfhhzeje3@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20181228014143.GE3210@paquier.xyz>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-1013-2c1e88
Precedence: bulk

On 2018-Dec-28, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 09:36:57AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > like the attached perhaps?  At the same time I am thinking about
> > reformulating the second sentence as well..
> >
> >  /*
> > - * This is default value for wal_segment_size to be used at initdb when run
> > - * without --walsegsize option. Must be a valid segment size.
> > + * This is the default value for wal_segment_size to be used when initdb is run
> > + * without the --wal-segsize option.  It must be a valid segment size.
> >   */
> >  #define DEFAULT_XLOG_SEG_SIZE	(16*1024*1024)
> 
> So, any objections with this change?  If somebody has a better
> wording, please feel free to chime in.

Looks good to me.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services